insurance and property damages cases of interest
EY V. INS. CO
DAVE V. ___STATE COMPANY
DAVE V. ___STATE COMPANY
Following a major homeowner's insurance claims, disputes arose regarding a variety of aspects of coverage and the insurance company's deficient payments and bad faith.. Litigation was commenced in Federal District Court and resolved prior to trial.
SETTLED PRIOR TO TRIAL $1.75M.
DAVE V. ___STATE COMPANY
DAVE V. ___STATE COMPANY
DAVE V. ___STATE COMPANY
Following a catastrophic fire destroying the insured's home in its entirety, the insurance company issued a complete insurance claim denied alleging misrepresentation and also that the insured did not "reside" at the property.
SETTLED AFTER MEDIATION FOR $675,000.00
TENANTS V. SUPERMARKET
DAVE V. ___STATE COMPANY
TENANTS V. SUPERMARKET
After a catastrophic fire destroyed an apartment building in Brooklyn, our office represented tenants who were uninsured and had lost their contents. After securing the return of each of their security deposits, a lawsuit was commenced.
SETTLED FOR $350,000.00
OMK V. KSIC
VV V MAJOR INS. CO
TENANTS V. SUPERMARKET
Insurance carrier denied coverage for a major water damage incident stemming from a failure of the heating system in a high end multi-million dollar home. Agulnick was retained and obtained a reversal of the determination, resulting in full coverage of the claim
CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL FOR $475,000.00
VV V MAJOR INS. CO
VV V MAJOR INS. CO
VV V MAJOR INS. CO
Following a major water main break in Queens, New York, which caused several feet of water to inundate the client's home, the carrier denied the claim in its entirety claiming that the policy had an exclusion for surface water
SUMMARY JUDGMENT GRANTED. SETTLED FULL VALUE
ZIG V INS CO
VV V MAJOR INS. CO
VV V MAJOR INS. CO
Denied a claim arising from burglars entering a commercial property, breaking the walls and stealing copper piping from the walls. Insurance company’s alleged the destruction was the result of theft and not covered under the policy.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT GRANTED.
LEI V CONTRACTOR
UNIVERSITY CYBER CLAIM
UNIVERSITY CYBER CLAIM
During the course of the construction of a small commercial office building, subcontractor failed to properly shore vertical supports during excavation. As a result, the vertical supports shifted causing the building to partially collapse. resulting in lost rents, fines, and consequential damages
SETTLED FOR $305,000.00
UNIVERSITY CYBER CLAIM
UNIVERSITY CYBER CLAIM
UNIVERSITY CYBER CLAIM
After an initial offer of $50,000 for cyber losses under a Cyber policy, Agulnick Kremin successfully navigated through the claim disputes and obtained a $2.4M claim settlement.
SETTLED FOR $2.4M
KOBBEL V INS. CO.
UNIVERSITY CYBER CLAIM
KOBBEL V INS. CO.
Denied a claim arising from burglars entering a commercial property, breaking the walls and stealing copper piping from the walls. Insurance company’s alleged the destruction was the result of theft and not covered under the policy.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT GRANTED.
SANCHEZ V OHIC
ASTORIA WATER MAIN CLAIMS
KOBBEL V INS. CO.
Property occupied by a hostile tenant. After legal action by the insured, an eviction was scheduled, however, the day prior to the eviction there was a fire at the building. Insurance company denied the claim based upon the insured’s alleged failure to comply with the protective safeguard provision of the policy.SETTLED for $195,000.00
D. V ALLSTATE
ASTORIA WATER MAIN CLAIMS
ASTORIA WATER MAIN CLAIMS
During the course of the construction of a small commercial office building, subcontractor failed to properly shore vertical supports during excavation. As a result, the vertical supports shifted causing the building to partially collapse. resulting in lost rents, fines, and consequential damages
SETTLED FOR $305,000.00
ASTORIA WATER MAIN CLAIMS
ASTORIA WATER MAIN CLAIMS
ASTORIA WATER MAIN CLAIMS
Successfully represented 7 homeowners with uncovered losses and basement damages stemming from a 2014 municipal water main break. After obtaining Summary Judgment against the City of New York, settlements were obtained for all 7 families
SETTLED IN FULL
HELPING TO SHAPE THE LAW
DECISIONS OF INTEREST
Lee v. Union Mutual
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Sabharwal v. Hyundai Marine Fire
Appellate Division - Second Department
Cohen v. Tri-State
Appellate Division - Second Department
Supreme Court Nassau County
Gurdip V. Seneca Insurance Company
Supreme Court Monroe County
GC Clinton v. Leading Insurance Company
Appellate Division - Second Department
Baron v. ____________
Supreme Court Suffolk County
Zigelman v. US Liability
Supreme Court Kings County
Nunez v. US Underwriters Ins. Co.
Limoncelli v. Bierman
Appellate Division - Second Department
AGULNICK KREMIN P.C. PROVIDES LEGAL ADVICE AND REPRESENTATION FOR INDIVIDUALS AND CORPORATE ENTITIES IN COMMUNITIES THROUGHOUT THE NEW YORK STATE, THE NEW YORK CITY REGION AND LONG ISLAND, INCLUDING MANHATTAN, QUEENS, BRONX, BROOKLYN, RICHMOND, LONG ISLAND CITY, GARDEN CITY, WHITE PLAINS, ROSLYN, PLAINVIEW, MANHASSET, WESTCHESTER, ROCKVILLE CENTER, SEARINGTOWN, THE HAMPTONS, LARCHMONT, DIX HILLS, YONKERS, LITTLE NECK, PORT WASHINGTON, KEW GARDENS, FOREST HILLS, ASTORIA, MINEOLA, GLEN COVE, HEMPSTEAD, LEVITTOWN, FLUSHING, JAMAICA, FLORAL PARK, HEWLETT, JERICHO, BAYSIDE AND ROCKLAND, NEW YORK.
THE INFORMATION YOU OBTAIN AT THIS SITE IS NOT, NOR IS IT INTENDED TO BE, LEGAL ADVICE. YOU SHOULD CONSULT AN ATTORNEY FOR ADVICE REGARDING YOUR INDIVIDUAL SITUATION. WE INVITE YOU TO CONTACT US AND WELCOME YOUR CALLS, LETTERS AND ELECTRONIC MAIL. **CONTACTING US OR SUBMITTING A CLAIM DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. PLEASE DO NOT SEND ANY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TO US UNTIL SUCH TIME AS AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED
Copyright © 2023 agulnickkremin.com - All Rights Reserved.
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.